Hydrogen blending
Evaluating blend ratios and the derate, materials and control changes they demand before any of it reaches a customer site.
Sustainability
Measured at the
machine, not
estimated after.
Switching a site from diesel to natural gas or propane reduces CO₂ and particulate emissions, cuts the number of service events by a factor of three to six, and removes fuel-spill exposure from the site entirely. All of it is captured by equipment telemetry rather than modeled at the end of the quarter.
↓ CO₂
Lower carbon per kWh than diesel
↓ PM
Lower particulate emissions
The environmental case
Four things change
when the fuel does.
None of these depend on offsets, accounting treatment or a future technology. They follow directly from burning a gaseous fuel instead of a liquid one.
By switching from a diesel generator to a natural gas or propane power system, a site
reduces CO₂ emissions as well as particulate matter emissions. Natural gas has a lower
carbon intensity per unit of energy than diesel, and gaseous combustion produces
substantially less particulate. The size of the reduction depends on the gas source, the
duty cycle and how well the units are sized to the actual load, which is why we measure
it per site rather than quoting a single headline number.
Fuel spill risks, which are of great concern, can be eliminated entirely. There is no
bulk liquid fuel stored on site, no tank to fail, no transfer to spill and no
contaminated ground to remediate. On sites near watercourses, in sensitive terrain, or
inside a community, this is frequently the single most important factor, ahead of
both cost and carbon.
Every package ships in a sound-attenuated enclosure. Where generation sits near
accommodation, a community or a workface, that difference is experienced daily rather
than reported annually.
The same units run on renewable natural gas, and on wellhead gas or coal-bed methane
that would otherwise be flared or vented. Using gas that was going to be released anyway
is often the largest single emissions lever available on an energy site, and it needs
no new equipment, only a fuel analysis.
Measurement
Reportable numbers,
not modeled ones.
Our proprietary telemetry platform captures equipment-level emissions and fuel data continuously, 30+ parameters every 15 minutes, 24/7/365. That produces a defensible basis for ESG reporting, because the figure comes from the machine rather than from an assumption about how the machine probably ran.
- Equipment-level capture: per unit, not per fleet average
- Continuous, not sampled: every 15 minutes, year round
- Fuel and emissions together, so intensity per kWh is derivable
- Same data you're billed on under a Power-as-a-Service structure
Indexed against an equivalent diesel package
Fuel cost per kWh
−30% to −80%Scheduled service events
÷3 to ÷6CO₂e per kWh
Materially lowerOn-site liquid fuel spill risk
Eliminated
Diesel baseline
Remote Power gaseous package
Bars are illustrative of the ranges described above, not results from a single site. Actual figures vary with fuel source, load factor and site conditions.
Research
What we're working on.
Active research programs, not shipping product. We'd rather say so than imply otherwise.
Battery integration
Deeper genset-plus-BESS control so the bank runs fewer hours at a better heat rate rather than chasing the load curve.
Emissions instrumentation
Extending equipment-level measurement toward audit-grade reporting, so the number in the ESG report is the number from the stack.
Get the numbers
See what the switch
is worth on your site.
Model the fuel saving and CO₂e avoided, then send it through for a formal comparison.
- Direct line
- 403-540-8812
- Quotes & enquiries
- alex@remotepowercorp.com
- Head office
- Suite 1500, 150 - 9th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3H9